Why Now We’re Talking About Multifamily’s Model Shift
In the video at the center of this post, the argument isn’t “multifamily is dying.” It’s something more subtle — and far more important for serious investors.
Rather than fear-mongering or dramatic predictions, the video highlights that the multifamily investment model that dominated the last decade is quietly evolving. What used to be a relatively straightforward play — buy apartments, collect rents, refinance, repeat — is now being reshaped by forces beneath the surface that most investors don’t talk about enough. The narrative isn’t about fundamentals suddenly disappearing — demand for housing, rent rolls, and occupancy rates remain generally solid — but about what’s changed in capital markets, regulation, and operating economics that are redefining how returns get made today.
Instead of dramatic crashes or hype, the video shows a sector in transition — where the old assumptions about underwriting, leverage, and pricing power no longer hold as reliably as they once did. It’s a reality check rooted in structural shifts rather than emotion-driven narratives. And that’s important: this isn’t about condemning multifamily, it’s about understanding the new game being played.
That sets the stage for this post: not to scare you, but to explain what’s changing underneath the headlines — so you can see where risk is really hiding, and where opportunity still exists.
Force #1: Capital Concentration
Multifamily didn’t become fragile because people stopped needing housing.
It became sensitive because too much money decided it was the safest place to be.
Over the last decade, multifamily became the institutional darling of commercial real estate. Pension funds, private equity groups, syndicators, family offices, high-income professionals - everyone piled into apartments.
At first, that seemed like validation.
But capital concentration changes market dynamics.
When too much money chases the same asset class, three predictable things happen:
Pricing gets aggressive.
Returns compress.
Risk gets buried inside the structure.
Cap rates tightened to historic lows. Deals were won not by discipline, but by optimism. Underwriting stretched to justify thinner yields. Leverage increased to manufacture acceptable IRRs.
And because so much capital was flowing into the space, those risks didn’t show up immediately.
They were absorbed by rising rents.
They were masked by cheap debt.
They were rewarded by cap rate compression.
But capital concentration doesn’t just affect pricing - it affects behavior.
When multifamily becomes the consensus “safe bet,” skepticism fades. Investors stop asking, “What breaks this deal?” and start asking, “How do we scale faster?”
That’s when fragility begins.
Because once returns compress far enough, operators are forced to reach for yield. And reaching for yield almost always means:
Higher leverage
Shorter debt terms
More aggressive rent growth assumptions
Dependency on refinance timing
None of that makes multifamily inherently bad.
But it changes the margin for error.
When capital floods an asset class, safety becomes a narrative - not a guarantee.
And once the capital cycle turns, the same concentration that drove prices up can amplify pressure on the way down.
The issue isn’t that multifamily fundamentals disappeared.
The issue is that the capital stack around multifamily became crowded, competitive, and assumption-heavy.
And that changes everything.
Force #2: Regulatory Risk + Revenue Uncertainty
Multifamily has traditionally benefited from one major advantage:
Predictable income.
Annual leases.
Broad tenant diversification.
Consistent demand.
But that predictability is becoming less certain - not because people don’t need housing, but because the rules around housing are changing.
And when revenue becomes politically sensitive, it becomes structurally uncertain.
Across multiple states and municipalities, we’re seeing:
Rent control expansions
Good-cause eviction laws
Extended notice requirements
Moratorium precedents
Increased tenant protections
Property tax reassessments tied to political pressure
None of these individually destroy a deal.
But together, they introduce a new layer of risk: policy risk.
And policy risk behaves differently than market risk.
Market risk moves with supply, demand, and pricing cycles.
Policy risk can change overnight.
When eviction moratoriums were introduced during COVID, many operators realized something critical:
Revenue isn’t always purely contractual.
It can become political.
Now zoom out.
If housing affordability continues to dominate headlines, multifamily owners — especially in urban markets — become visible targets. When voters feel squeezed, elected officials respond. And that response often shows up as restrictions on pricing flexibility.
Here’s why that matters:
Multifamily is a business built on incremental rent growth.
If rent growth slows because of market conditions, operators can adjust.
If rent growth is constrained because of regulation, flexibility shrinks.
And when flexibility shrinks while expenses rise (which we’ll get to next), margin compression accelerates.
There’s another layer here that many newer investors haven’t experienced:
Local risk dispersion.
Two identical 150-unit apartment buildings in two different states can have completely different risk profiles based purely on:
Landlord-tenant laws
Tax structures
Insurance environments
Political climate
That means asset class analysis isn’t enough anymore.
Geographic regulatory analysis matters just as much.
Multifamily hasn’t lost demand.
But in certain markets, it has lost pricing power.
And when revenue becomes less elastic - while costs remain volatile - the business model tightens.
This doesn’t mean apartments are uninvestable.
It means the era of “set it and forget it” underwriting is over.
Experienced operators are now underwriting not just vacancy and rent growth…
They’re underwriting regulatory trajectory.
And that’s a very different game.
Force #3: Expense Inflation Without Pricing Power
Here’s where the model really starts to strain.
Multifamily is facing rising operating costs at the exact moment revenue flexibility is tightening.
That combination is dangerous.
Over the last several years, operators across the country have experienced:
Insurance premiums doubling (or worse in some markets)
Property tax reassessments tied to peak valuations
Higher payroll and labor costs
Increased maintenance and materials expenses
Utility cost volatility
Unlike rent growth - which can slow - expenses rarely reverse.
They reset higher.
And while rent growth during the 2021–2022 surge masked these increases, today’s environment looks different. In many markets, rent growth has normalized. In some submarkets, it’s flat or negative due to oversupply.
That creates a structural squeeze.
Because here’s the uncomfortable truth:
Apartments do not have unlimited pricing power.
Yes, housing is a necessity.
But tenants have ceilings.
When affordability gets stretched, demand doesn’t disappear - it shifts. Renters downsize. They move to cheaper submarkets. They double up. They negotiate concessions.
Operators can’t simply pass through every cost increase the way some other asset classes can.
Industrial landlords with long-term triple-net leases often shift expense risk to tenants.
Retail landlords with structured leases may have expense reimbursements baked in.
Multifamily owners?
They absorb more variability.
When insurance jumps 60%, you can’t just send tenants a 60% increase notice.
And if regulatory pressure (Force #2) constrains rent growth further, the squeeze tightens.
Now layer in capital concentration (Force #1).
Deals purchased at compressed cap rates with thin margins are far more sensitive to expense shocks.
A $300,000 annual insurance increase might be manageable in a conservatively structured deal.
In a thinly capitalized deal with aggressive underwriting?
It can wipe out distributions - or worse, push DSCR into uncomfortable territory.
This is the compounding effect:
Capital concentration compresses margins.
Regulation limits revenue flexibility.
Expense inflation increases the cost base.
Individually, these forces are manageable.
Together, they change the return equation.
Not because multifamily stopped working.
But because the assumptions that used to drive outperformance - cheap debt, strong rent growth, minimal regulatory interference - are no longer guaranteed.
And when guarantees disappear, discipline becomes the differentiator.
Why This Doesn’t Mean “Multifamily Is Dead”
Let’s be clear about something.
Multifamily is not dead.
Apartments are not going away.
Housing demand has not collapsed.
People still need places to live. Population growth still exists in many markets. Household formation hasn’t stopped. Long-term demographic drivers are still intact.
What’s changed isn’t the necessity of housing. What’s changed is the ease of making money in housing.
For much of the last decade, multifamily benefited from a rare alignment:
Cheap debt
Expanding liquidity
Strong rent growth
Cap rate compression
Massive capital inflows
You didn’t have to be a perfect operator to win in that environment.
Rising rents could cover mistakes.
Refinancing could fix aggressive leverage.
Cap rate compression could manufacture equity.
That environment created the perception that multifamily was inherently safe.
But what we’re experiencing now isn’t the death of the asset class.
It’s the removal of tailwinds.
And when tailwinds disappear, only fundamentals remain.
Multifamily still works when:
Deals are bought at reasonable valuations
Debt is structured conservatively
Reserves are built properly
Revenue assumptions are realistic
Operators are disciplined
The difference is this:
In today’s environment, you must make money operationally - not financially engineer it through refinancing and appreciation alone. That’s not a collapse. That’s normalization.
Every asset class goes through phases:
Discovery
Capital inflow
Compression
Correction
Discipline
Multifamily is transitioning from compression to discipline. And that’s not a bad thing for experienced operators. In fact, it often creates better opportunities.
When capital concentration thins out…
When speculative players exit…
When underwriting tightens…
Deals get more rational. Margins slowly return. The game becomes less about hype and more about execution.
Multifamily isn’t dying. It’s maturing. The investors who struggle in this phase are those who relied on momentum. The investors who thrive are those who understand structure, margin, and long-term durability.
And that leads to the next question:
What are experienced operators doing differently right now?
That’s where the real opportunity lives.
What Experienced Operators Are Doing Differently
The difference in this cycle isn’t the asset. It’s the approach. While less experienced investors are still underwriting to old assumptions, seasoned operators have quietly adjusted their playbook. They’re not panicking. They’re recalibrating. Here’s what that looks like in practice.
1. They’re Prioritizing Margin Over Momentum
Experienced operators are no longer chasing deals to “stay active.”
They’re buying fewer properties - but better ones.
They’re asking:
Does this deal work without rent growth?
Can this property cash flow at today’s rates - not last year’s?
Is there real downside protection?
Instead of underwriting to make a deal work, they’re underwriting to see if it survives stress.
If it doesn’t, they walk.
Volume is down. Discipline is up.
2. They’re Structuring Conservative Debt
This may be the biggest shift.
Operators who lived through prior cycles understand that debt structure determines survival. So they’re:
Locking fixed-rate financing whenever possible
Lowering leverage
Avoiding short-term bridge loans unless there’s a clear path
Stress-testing refinance scenarios
They are no longer relying on “we’ll just refinance in three years.” If the deal only works with perfect timing, they pass. Capital structure is now the first conversation - not the last.
3. They’re Building Real Reserves
In the previous cycle, some deals were capitalized tightly because liquidity felt infinite.
Today, experienced operators are building cushion back into their models.
They’re budgeting for:
Insurance volatility
Tax reassessments
Slower lease-up
Unexpected repairs
Because reserves aren’t optional in tightening cycles. They’re survival tools.
4. They’re Being Hyper-Selective on Market Exposure
Not all multifamily markets carry the same risk profile.
Operators are paying closer attention to:
Regulatory trajectory
Supply pipelines
Political climate
Insurance markets
Landlord-tenant laws
A 200-unit property in a landlord-friendly state with moderate supply looks very different from one in a heavily regulated coastal market with aggressive development. The asset class label isn’t enough anymore. Location risk now requires deeper scrutiny.
5. They’re Focusing on Operational Excellence - Not Financial Engineering
Perhaps the biggest mindset shift: Experienced operators are returning to fundamentals.
They’re improving:
Tenant retention
Expense controls
Maintenance efficiency
Revenue management
They’re not depending on cap rate compression to manufacture equity.
They’re creating it operationally.
That’s a very different investment thesis.
6. They’re Exploring Alternatives - Without Abandoning Multifamily
Here’s something interesting:
Many experienced investors aren’t leaving multifamily entirely.
They’re diversifying within commercial real estate.
They’re asking:
Where is capital less crowded?
Where do lease structures shift expense risk?
Where does pricing power look stronger?
Where are margins wider?
That doesn’t mean apartments disappear from the portfolio.
It means multifamily is no longer the only lever.
In crowded environments, opportunity often lives just outside consensus.
The Big Difference
In the previous cycle, the question was: “How fast can we grow?” In this cycle, the question is: “How resilient is this deal?” That’s a healthier framework because cycles reward discipline more than enthusiasm.
Multifamily isn’t broken. But the investors who continue operating as if it’s 2021? They’re going to feel pressure. The ones who adapt? They’ll quietly build stronger portfolios while others sit on the sidelines.
Watch the Full Breakdown - And Start Thinking Beyond One Asset Class
If you’ve made it this far, you already understand the bigger point: This isn’t about declaring multifamily dead. It’s about recognizing that the model has shifted.
Capital concentration has compressed margins.
Regulatory pressure has introduced revenue uncertainty.
Expense inflation is squeezing operators without guaranteed pricing power.
Those forces don’t eliminate opportunity.
They just demand a higher level of discipline.
In the full video, I walk through these dynamics in more detail - including how they’re showing up in real deals right now, what investors are underestimating, and where I see both pressure and potential emerging over the next few years.
Because here’s the truth:
If you only know how to invest in one asset class, you’re not diversified - you’re dependent.
Experienced investors don’t panic when one sector tightens.
They adjust.
They reallocate.
They look for margin where others aren’t looking.
Sometimes that means buying multifamily differently.
Sometimes it means waiting.
Sometimes it means exploring alternative asset classes where:
Capital isn’t as crowded
Lease structures shift expense risk
Regulatory exposure is lower
Pricing power is stronger
Margins are wider
The goal isn’t to abandon apartments.
The goal is to understand the cycle - and position yourself accordingly.
If you want the deeper breakdown, watch the full video linked above.
And if you’re serious about building a durable commercial real estate portfolio - one that can survive changing debt markets, policy shifts, and operating pressure - start thinking beyond headlines and into structure. Because in this market, resilience beats momentum. And structure beats narrative.
For those interested in delving deeper into commercial real estate investing, check out our course offerings. The courses provide in-depth insights, real-world case studies, and practical strategies to help you navigate the complexities of commercial real estate and achieve success in your ventures. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just starting in the world of commercial real estate, there's always more to learn. Equip yourself with the knowledge and tools you need to thrive in commercial real estate!
In the video at the center of this post, the argument isn’t “multifamily is dying.” It’s something more subtle - and far more important for serious investors.
Rather than fear-mongering or dramatic predictions, the video highlights that the multifamily investment model that dominated the last decade is quietly evolving. What used to be a relatively straightforward play — buy apartments, collect rents, refinance, repeat — is now being reshaped by forces beneath the surface that most investors don’t talk about enough. The narrative isn’t about fundamentals suddenly disappearing — demand for housing, rent rolls, and occupancy rates remain generally solid - but about what’s changed in capital markets, regulation, and operating economics that are redefining how returns get made today.
Instead of dramatic crashes or hype, the video shows a sector in transition - where the old assumptions about underwriting, leverage, and pricing power no longer hold as reliably as they once did. It’s a reality check rooted in structural shifts rather than emotion-driven narratives. And that’s important: this isn’t about condemning multifamily, it’s about understanding the new game being played.
That sets the stage for this post: not to scare you, but to explain what’s changing underneath the headlines - so you can see where risk is really hiding, and where opportunity still exists.